IS & Ex


Intrinsic safety considerations

March 2001 IS & Ex

All intrinsically safe equipment relies for its safety integrity on being adequately electrically protected so that electrical overloads do not generate excessive heat or incendive sparks. This article concentrates on intrinsic safety, where there tends to be more emphasis on the requirements of electrical protection and earthing. This is largely because of historical background to the development of the technique but is justified to some extent because of the use of intrinsically safe equipment in the more hazardous location of Zone 0. The possibility of working on circuits without isolating them and the requirement that some monitoring equipment has to remain functional in the presence of major gas releases or catastrophic circumstances also leads to further concern.

The earthing of shunt diode safety barriers illustrates the fundamental requirements very well and hence is discussed in considerable detail. The shunt diode safety barrier was introduced to remove the necessity to certify complex safe-area equipment. It is designed to permit the normal operation of the circuit, and if a fault occurs within the safe-area equipment it should prevent the passage of a level of energy which can cause ignition or a level of power which can cause excessive temperature rise. A more detailed description of the operation of shunt diode barriers and also galvanic isolators is given in TP1113 'Shunt diode safety barriers and galvanic isolators - a critical comparison'.

The protection technique of shunt diode barriers is illustrated by Figure 1. A fault current derived from the mains phase voltage invades the safe-area side of the barrier. Part of the current may flow through the fuse of the barrier, rupturing it; but a significant part of it would flow through the 0 V rail of the barrier system, being limited in magnitude only by the impedance of the fault circuit, and its duration determined by the fuse or other fault-current limitation protecting the phase providing the fault current. The return path provided to the neutral star point ensures that the fault current does not enter the hazardous area, by presenting a lower-impedance path along which the current prefers to flow.

Figure 1. Safe-area barrier fault current
Figure 1. Safe-area barrier fault current

Barrier-protected intrinsically safe circuits are earthed at the barrier busbar only, and elsewhere are insulated from the plant structure. The field mounted instrument illustrated in Figure 1 would normally have its enclosure bonded to the structure and its internal electronics isolated from the case and directly connected to the barrier. (The level of isolation required is to be capable of withstanding a 500 V test. It is, however, advisable to avoid doing a 500 V test on an installation where there is any possibility of a flammable gas being present.)

During the short time that the fault current is flowing, a voltage drop occurs in the return path between the points X1 and X. This voltage difference is transferred to the field mounted instrument since the enclosure is bonded to the structure at the same potential as the point X and the internal electronics directly connected to the point X1. Since this voltage difference occurs in the hazardous area it is desirable that it should be less than 10 V so that the probability of an incendive spark is acceptably low. If the fault current from the 240 V supply is 100 A (a fault circuit impedance of 2,4 Ohm) then the impedance between X and X1 should be less than 0,1 Ohm. It is important to recognise that this is the resistance of the conductor between the barrier busbar and the neutral star point. The resistance of the connection to ground is not important since the fault current does not return to ground, it returns to the neutral star point. Various codes of practice suggests that a value of 1 Ohm is acceptable but this is possibly too high.

The lower value is usually readily achievable, since the barrier earth connection is always quite short and is a robust cable to ensure its mechanical integrity. For example, a 10 mm2 copper conductor has a resistance of 2,8 mOhm/m. Hence a 25 m cable would have a resistance of 70 mOhm and so would satisfy the requirement.

It is interesting that a mains supply fault in the hazardous area, as illustrated in Figure 2 produces a similar potential difference created by the fault current flowing through the plant structure. The multiple return paths and cross bonding must create a low resistance return path of the same order as the barrier earth conductor so as to avoid significant voltage differences.

Figure 2. Hazardous-area barrier fault current
Figure 2. Hazardous-area barrier fault current

The use of galvanic isolators as interfaces changes the earthing requirements from being a primary contributor to the method of protection, to a secondary one. Figure 3 shows the fault being removed in a relatively short time by having a well-defined return path on the safe-area side of the isolator. Voltage elevation of the safe-area side of the isolator is not transferred to the hazardous area, but a prolonged mains fault would damage the components on the safe-area side, or more probably damage the computer input circuit. In these circumstances the earth return is not vital to safety and is primarily essential for operational and electrical protection reasons.

Figure 3. Safe-area isolator fault current
Figure 3. Safe-area isolator fault current

Combined earthing for interference avoidance and intrinsic safety purposes

In almost all circumstances the 0 V rail of the computer and the barrier busbar are linked by the method of measurement and hence the earth returns are combined.

Figure 4 reiterates the normal practice of returning the computer 0 V and the screens of the field wiring separately from the structural and power system to the neutral star point. This system ensures a defined fault return path for any power faults or induced interference currents and prevents the power system currents generating a common mode voltage on the 0 V rail of the computer.

Figure 4. Earth return system for nonhazardous plant
Figure 4. Earth return system for nonhazardous plant

The introduction of the shunt diode barrier does not appreciably change the circumstances, as illustrated by Figure 5. The earth returns are combined by linking the computer 0 V rail and screens to the barrier busbar, and the earth return path should meet the resistance requirement of at least 1 Ohm but preferably 0,1 Ohm.

Figure 5. Earth-return system for plant using shunt diode barrier
Figure 5. Earth-return system for plant using shunt diode barrier

When isolators are used, the barrier busbar is omitted and the screens of the field wiring are connected to the 0 V rail of the system as indicated in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Earth-return system for plant using isolators
Figure 6. Earth-return system for plant using isolators

In these circumstances the earth return from the 0 V rail has to be of the same standard as for shunt diode safety barriers since the transient potential differences developed across it appear as voltage differences between the cable screens and the structure within the hazardous area.

Figure 7. Earth-return system for plant using surge protection devices and shunt diode barrier
Figure 7. Earth-return system for plant using surge protection devices and shunt diode barrier

Practical consideration

The conventional installation becomes as illustrated in Figure 8 with the barrier busbar and computer 0 V insulated from the structure and returned separately to the neutral star point bond.

Figure 8. Conventional shunt diode barrier installation
Figure 8. Conventional shunt diode barrier installation

It is normally a requirement that the barrier busbar return path be periodically checked. This check is much easier to do if the connection is duplicated as shown in Figures 8 and 9. If this is done then an accurate resistance measurement can be made by disconnecting one lead and inserting a low-voltage meter in series with the resulting loop. (Note that the loop resistance is four items the parallel resistance of the normal installation.) A record of this measurement should be maintained and any instability in the readings investigated. A great advantage is that such a check can be done without a major disturbance of plant function.

Figure 9. Testing of shunt diode return path
Figure 9. Testing of shunt diode return path

The two connecting wires need to be routed close to one another but should form an effective ring main as shown in Figure 9. Concern is frequently expressed about the resultant loop generating a magnetic pick-up problem but considerable experience suggests that this is not a practical problem. The earth return lead needs to be identified and a common practice is to bind the two leads together with blue insulating tape at frequent intervals so as to distinguish them from other similar conductors.

With this type of installation it is worthwhile to measure the resistance between the busbar and the cabinet, since this is an indication of the effectiveness of the structural bond. If facilities are available a note of the voltage waveform existing between the structure and busbar should be made. This waveform is frequently an indicator of deterioration in the structural bond or the introduction of interference-generating equipment. Frequently a knowledge of this waveform is useful in diagnosing problems.

Some care has to be taken that the terminals used for earth connections should be of high quality and vibration-proof. The best practical solution is to use the terminals that are suitable for increased safety (Ex e) installations. It is permissible to carry critical earth connections via plug and sockets, but three strategically placed pins must be used and some precautions taken to prevent disconnection without first removing power from the protected installation.



Credit(s)



Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

New modules for distributed integration of intrinsically safe signals
Beckhoff Automation IS & Ex
Beckhoff provides a compact acquisition solution for intrinsically safe signals up to zone 0/20 with the IP67-protected EtherCAT Box modules of the EPX series.

Read more...
Control and monitoring with only one device
Pepperl+Fuchs IS & Ex
Pepperl+Fuchs has expanded its portfolio of K-System isolated barriers for DIN rail mounting (power rail) with the KCD2-SCS interface module. As the first 2-channel AI/AO intrinsic safety barrier with dual function, the module can be configured individually for analogue input or output control signals.

Read more...
Hazardous area solutions
Extech Safety Systems Motion Control & Drives
SEW-EURODRIVE is revolutionising industrial automation with advanced gear units, decentralised drives and the energy-efficient MOVIGEAR system.

Read more...
Inspection system for leak detection in valves in hazardous areas
Extech Safety Systems Valves, Actuators & Pump Control
Leaking valves in industrial plants not only lead to loss, safety risks and possible contamination and pollution, but also result in high economic costs. Therefore, valves in hazardous areas require regular proper inspection and preventive maintenance to ensure their functionality.

Read more...
Field service regime key for effective PDS/CPS operation
IS & Ex
While their primary objective is to ensure the safety of people, proximity detection system and collision prevention system installations also have a direct bearing on other critical parameters such as equipment availability and productivity.

Read more...
World’s first 5G smartphone for ATEX and IECEx zone 1/21
Extech Safety Systems IS & Ex
i.safe MOBILE has launched the world’s first 5G smartphone for ATEX and IECEx zone 1/21. The intrinsically safe mobile device, which was also developed for use in 5G campus networks, offers companies great flexibility thanks to its wide range of possible applications, especially in the automation sector.

Read more...
Fully Ex-certified access point solutions for wireless communication
Pepperl+Fuchs IS & Ex
Pepperl+Fuchs now offers a wireless access point solution that is fully certified in accordance with ATEX/IECEx standards, and forms the basis for end-to-end Wi-Fi communication in hazardous areas.

Read more...
Secure, digital communication in potentially explosive atmospheres
Pepperl+Fuchs IS & Ex
Consistently digitalised processes in the smart factory are a matter of course today, but not in potentially explosive atmospheres. The systems and devices used in these areas must have optimal protection mechanisms to ensure maximum safety.

Read more...
Functional and compatible intrinsically safe loop approvals
Extech Safety Systems IS & Ex
With all the focus on IS loop approval, it is easy to forget to check that the loop will function correctly to see whether the field device has sufficient power (voltage & current) to operate over the full process range.

Read more...
Upgrade your legacy alarm units
Omniflex Remote Monitoring Specialists IS & Ex
Darren Barratt, sales manager at alarm annunciator specialist Omniflex, explains the drawbacks of leaving outdated rack-based alarm annunciator systems in place, and why an upgrade might be simpler than you would expect.

Read more...