IT in Manufacturing


The 5 stages of cybersecurity awareness

October 2018 IT in Manufacturing

Standards committees and other industry groups have developed and promoted several conceptual models that describe a stepwise approach to cybersecurity for industrial control systems (ICS). These models address the people, pro-cess, and technology elements of the cybersecurity response.

Before any of these recommendations can be implemented, managers must first understand and accept the risks they face and the potential consequences. An understanding of human behaviour can help.

The Kübler-Ross model (often referred to as ‘The Five Stages of Grief’), describes a progression of emotional states associated with traumatic events. This model offers an interesting way to understand (and thus better address) these industrial cybersecurity-related challenges.

Applying the Kübler-Ross grief model to cybersecurity

At first glance the Kübler-Ross grief model may appear to have little to do with how we manage the security of automation systems. However, there are parallels between it and acceptance of the growing threat of cybersecurity attacks or compromises of automation systems used in the critical infrastructure.

Stage 1: Denial

When asked about programs and levels of preparedness in the face of potential attacks or compromise, common responses heard include: “We are not a target.” “Why would anyone attack us?” or “We are not connected to the Internet.” The assumption that responsibility for cybersecurity rests exclusively with the IT department is also a form of denial.

Stage 2: Anger

When presented with these realities, it is common for managers to express anger or frustration. This is almost certain to happen in the wake of an actual attack or incident that negatively impacts critical systems. This is evident from the types of questions that responsible managers will pose to their staff. Examples include:

• Why didn’t you warn me about the risk of network connections?

• Can’t we meet the legitimate needs of the business in a secure manner?

• Why have we allowed sloppy practices such as the sharing of portable media to increase the risk to our systems?

Managers may ask questions like these even after previously refusing to heed warnings and provide the resources needed to improve the security of key systems before an incident occurs. This can in turn lead to frustration on the part of cybersecurity professionals whose advice was not taken.

While both responses are understandable, they do little or nothing to address the real problem or improve the situation. Rapid response is necessary not only to address the immediate risk, but also to protect systems in the face of evolving risk. Additional threats and vulnerabilities will emerge over time, possibly resulting in even more serious consequences.

Stage 3: Bargaining

Identifying, analysing, and selecting solutions to improve system security typically includes various types of bargaining. Internal and external discussion and dialog in this phase revolve around a fundamental assertion: “If we take certain steps now, will they increase our protection and mitigate consequences?” Of course, the difficulty is in determining exactly which steps or measures are ‘right’ or most appropriate for the situation.

This may be the most interesting and dangerous stage, as it requires steadfastness in the face of urgency. It is essential to reconcile input, opinions, and proposals from different stakeholders and advisors, each that will bring their own perceptions, biases and agendas.

The most critical need at this stage is for a well-defined and proven process for identifying and evaluating proposed solutions. The key input to this process is a clear set of constraints, expectations, and requirements. Where possible, the latter should be based on or derived from established industry standards and practices.

Stage 4: Depression

Unfortunately, threats and vulnerabilities are constantly evolving, and new attacks are reported regularly. Each new report triggers an exercise to reassess protective tools and processes, leading to further frustration and fatigue. At this stage it is common to become resigned to the inevitability of an attack or some type of cyber-related incident. This inevitability makes it essential to have a plan for response in advance.

To offset the natural discouragement, it is important to remain aware of not only successful attacks or incidents, but also the successes that others have had in mitigating threats or even preventing incidents.

Stage 5: Acceptance

Recognising the fact that virtually all computerised systems are at risk creates an environment for proper cybersecurity management. However, simple acknowledgment is not enough. It is also essential that managers understand that managing cybersecurity risk is no different than that required for any other type of risk, such as personal safety or handling hazardous materials. Many companies already have processes and procedures in these areas, and managers need to accept the need for a sustained cybersecurity response.

What this means for the asset owner

Industrial asset owners face a daunting challenge in defending and protecting the integrity of their automation systems. One of the first and perhaps most important milestones in successfully meeting this challenge is to understand and accept what can and cannot be changed.

Technical expertise is essential, but not sufficient. Experts must also have practical experience in industrial or operations environments to be most effective and avoid potential misapplication of specific solutions. They must be able to collaborate and work closely with their counterparts in other disciplines, such as automation and process safety.

Finally, members of the cybersecurity team must be able to effectively communicate with management and other non-technical personnel to help them understand the nature of the possible risks, the required response and the need for any changes in their behaviour.

For more information contact Paul Miller, ARC Advisory Group, +1 781 471 1141, [email protected], www.arcweb.com





Share this article:
Share via emailShare via LinkedInPrint this page

Further reading:

Fortifying the state in a time of cyber siege
IT in Manufacturing
In an era where borders are no longer physical, South Africa is being drawn into a new kind of conflict, one fought not with tanks and missiles, but with lines of code and silent intrusions. The digital battlefield is here, and cyber space has become the next frontier of conflict.

Read more...
Levelling up workplace safety - how gamification is changing the rules of training
IT in Manufacturing
Despite the best intentions, traditional safety training often falls short, with curricula either being too generic, too passive, or ultimately unmemorable. Enter gamification, a shift in training that is redefining how businesses train for safety and live by those principles.

Read more...
Reinventing data centre design: critical changes to meet surging
Schneider Electric South Africa IT in Manufacturing
AI technologies are pushing the boundaries of what is possible which, in turn, is presenting data centres with a whole new set of challenges. Fortunately, several options are emerging which include optimising design and infrastructure for efficiency, cooling and management systems

Read more...
Watts next - can IT save the planet
IT in Manufacturing
The digital age’s insatiable demand for computing power has collided with an urgent and pressing need for sustainability. As data centres and AI workloads consume unprecedented energy, IT providers are pivotal in redefining how technology intersects with environmental stewardship.

Read more...
South Africa’s digital revolution:
IT in Manufacturing
South Africa stands at a pivotal moment in its technological evolution, poised to redefine itself as Africa’s leading digital powerhouse. Over the past two years, political leaders and media narratives have painted a picture of rapid digital transformation, underscoring the government’s ambition to position South Africa at the forefront of innovation.

Read more...
Smart manufacturing, APC and the SA marketplace
Schneider Electric South Africa IT in Manufacturing
Manufacturers are prioritising the integration of smart technologies into their daily operations to stay one step ahead of the competition. In South Africa, some experts believe the country has the potential to leapfrog its global peers through the creation of smart factories.

Read more...
Schneider Electric’s Five-Pillar Strategy takes the guesswork out of equip
Schneider Electric South Africa IT in Manufacturing
Schneider Electric’s Field Service Cycle, otherwise known as the Five-Pillar Strategy, is a structured approach to managing the lifecycle of equipment to prolong asset lifespan while reducing the total cost of ownership for customers.

Read more...
Enhancing operational safety and efficiency through advanced risk-based modelling
IT in Manufacturing
Now, more than ever, capital and operational cost can be reduced while enhancing operational safety and increasing production uptime by applying transformative methods such as Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling.

Read more...
Laying the groundwork in IT/OT
IT in Manufacturing
In the realm of manufacturing, the core mandate is to deliver value to stakeholders. For many in the industry, this is best achieved through a risk-averse approach. Only upon establishing a robust foundation should a business consider venturing into advanced optimisation or cutting-edge technological innovations such as industrial AI.

Read more...
Looking into the future of machine vision
Omron Electronics IT in Manufacturing
Artificial intelligence (AI) is driving a significant transformation in all areas of industrial automation, and machine vision is no exception. Omron’s AI-powered machine vision systems seamlessly integrate state-of-the-art algorithms, enabling machines to analyse and interpret visual data meticulously.

Read more...









While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.




© Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd | All Rights Reserved