Endress + Hauser is urging the Fieldbus Foundation (FF) to use all influence and power to prevail upon members to provide to IEC and CENELEC immediately their complete and final list of all patents and patent applications that may impact the implementation of fieldbus technology.
Endress+Hauser has contacted the Fieldbus Foundation, IEC and CENELEC asking each to withdraw the publication of the international standard IEC 61158, "Fieldbus for use in industrial control systems" and the intended extension of the European standard EN 50170, "General-purpose field communication system". In a routine check, patent engineers from Endress + Hauser discovered that patents, or patent claims, of certain companies protected essential parts of these standards.
In an electronic message sent to Fieldbus Foundation (FF) Director John Pittman dated 17 March, 2000, Diether Schaudel, Chief Technical Officer of the Endress + Hauser Group writes: "Many companies, including Endress + Hauser, are investing significantly in the development of fieldbus technologies. Endress + Hauser is not willing to allow any company, in that arena, to limit our success and the success of other companies, by mixing the monopolistic effect of patents, with the public support of an international fieldbus standard. I am sure the Fieldbus Foundation will do its utmost to support all members of the Foundation, and to prevent them from the possible risk of a patent infringement."
Endress + Hauser believes, that according to the rules of IEC and CENELEC respectively, it is the obligation of patent holders to:
* Name voluntarily and without any specific invitation all patents or patent applications that may implicate the use of the standard
* Advise, to their best knowledge, they do not own any other IPR's relevant to the standard
* Grant unlimited license to any applicant
To date, the only direct response to Endress + Hauser from the Fieldbus Foundation has been a request for a list of all patents and/or patent holders that Endress + Hauser believes may be impacting the implementation of Fieldbus Foundation technology.
Schaudel sent separate letters to the IEC and CENELEC on this issue. CENELEC provided a response that Endress + Hauser says is unsatisfactory because it fails to create legal security for customers, and does not address the factual issues involved. Endress + Hauser has sent a second letter to CENELEC. Copies of the press release detailing this situation are available from Endress + Hauser's website.
For further information contact Diether Schaudel on (0941) 61 7157720 or
Why secure industrial communication depends on deployment as well
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
The Industrial Security Harmonisation Group has released a joint industry perspective highlighting a critical truth in industrial cybersecurity: secure communication is not determined by protocols alone, but by how they are deployed and managed in real-world environments.
Read more...A single platform for all automation functions Beckhoff Automation
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
The introduction of TwinCAT in 1996 marked a decisive evolutionary step for PC-based control. Today, the TwinCAT platform combines all automation functions in a strictly deterministic real-time environment, from PLC and motion control through CNC and measurement technology and beyond, to vision, robotics and pioneering AI tools.
Read more...Transforming the process industry through digitalisation Endress+Hauser South Africa
IT in Manufacturing
By connecting field devices, systems and people, digitalisation creates new opportunities to optimise operations, enhance maintenance strategies and support continuous improvement. As a leading instrumentation provider and major source of process data, Endress+Hauser plays a key role in enabling this transformation.
Read more...Loop signature Part 2-4: Feedforward Control: Part 3 Michael Brown Control Engineering
Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
In the previous articles in this series, the basic theory behind feedforward control was discussed, and it was also shown how to apply feedforward in practice. In this article, it will be shown how well feedforward can work in practice by giving a couple of examples.
Read more...Control Station and Dimension Software partner to connect control performance monitoring with enterprise operations intelligence
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Control Station has entered into a strategic technology partnership with Dimension Software, a leading provider of industrial operations management platforms. The collaboration connects Control Station’s PlantESP control loop performance monitoring platform with Dimension Software’s Asset Intellect operations intelligence environment, enabling manufacturers to operationalise control performance insights across their organisations.
Read more...Precise, synchronised control for automated steel mesh handling system
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Automation specialist Hambi Maschinenbau has developed a world-first system that automates the cutting, handling and stacking of heavy reinforcing steel mesh – a task that previously required up to six human operators.
Read more...Loop signature Part 2-3: Feedforward Control: Part 2 Michael Brown Control Engineering
Editor's Choice Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Feedforward control tuning is not nearly as critical as feedback tuning, and fairly simple models are usually fine for the purpose in hand.
Read more...Upgrading radiological surveillance systems in nuclear facilities Omniflex Remote Monitoring Specialists
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
Nuclear plant operators face an uncomfortable reality. Many of the control and monitoring systems still in use today were never designed to support the full operational lifespan of the facilities they serve.
Read more...Next-level CAN Software enables easy access to CAN XL Industrial Data Xchange (IDX)
Fieldbus & Industrial Networking
With the release of its PCAN-Explorer 7, PEAK delivers a major update that adds full support for CAN XL, multiple symbol files per connection, Python scripting and flexible licensing including floating licenses.
While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and its agents cannot be held responsible for any errors contained, or any loss incurred as a result. Articles published do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. The editor reserves the right to alter or cut copy. Articles submitted are deemed to have been cleared for publication. Advertisements and company contact details are published as provided by the advertiser. Technews Publishing (Pty) Ltd cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or veracity of supplied material.
printer friendly version